Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Cherry Blossom Technology Launch!!!
Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:42 am by BlueSodaX

» Will aiko V2+ can/will be able to have sex ?
Sat Jul 25, 2015 6:08 am by Lordoomer

» Is this project still going?
Tue Jul 21, 2015 9:54 pm by Superdog1138

» Aiko New Hand V2 from 3d printer
Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:44 am by Kthomp06

» Tip: Try to create a start-up
Fri Sep 19, 2014 6:03 pm by Kazama_Tenkai

» Hello Everyone!
Mon Feb 03, 2014 6:01 pm by BlueSodaX

» My best regards to Mr. Trungs herculean endeavor
Sun Jan 12, 2014 2:09 am by Discoman

» how to make robots that are more accepted by people-through war.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:22 pm by Boetharch

» Who want to see Sumomo From Chobits made?
Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:30 pm by minoru

June 2017
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Calendar Calendar


OT (thread may contain objectionable material - 18+)

View previous topic View next topic Go down

OT (thread may contain objectionable material - 18+)

Post  Artilects rule! on Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:14 am

This is the forum for it right?

I got so worked up over the Christopher Handley case lately, but I think these guidelines will help future illustrators and manga readers:

I personally don't think this is right, but these guidelines will help with future events.

No character who appears to be under 18 shall be depicted in sexual situations that includes physical contact of either:
genitals to anal,
genitals to genitals (breasts included as genitals),
oral to anal, or
oral to genitals weather of same or opposite gender.

This excludes hand to genital,
hand to oral, or
hand to anal activities.

Sex may be defined as penetration of character or a forced sexual encounter.
This excludes consented non penetrating acts.

Sexual activity may include masturbation, but a girl moving her hand under her panties isn't masturbation until she fingers herself.
Male masturbation can't be proven if the picture is cropped or the image is obscured or censored.

A stiffer (no pun intended) fine is given if a genital or pubic area is seen during the act, however nudity (in full or in part) is not fined if sexual activity as defined above does not take place.

My own opinion, it's art pure and simple.
Americans shouldn't be punished for Japanese illegal activity (shipping lolicon and shotacon out of Japan).

Bestiality contains the above with animals.
Laying naked among a lion's fur is not punishable by any means.
Riding or petting a Zebra naked is also not an offense.

To be child pornography, a reasonable person must not be able to distinguish the image from real life (which excludes lolicon and shotacon from a child porn offense), however if challenged, the above workarounds may apply.

Artilects rule!

Posts : 202
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2009-02-06
Location : United States

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: OT (thread may contain objectionable material - 18+)

Post  Konrad13 on Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:20 am

The prohibitions against computer-generated and illustrated child pornography have also been previously ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, when they were included in the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996.

Konrad13

Posts : 70
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2008-12-31
Age : 28
Location : Missouri

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum